Additional course info here
I. Introduction: What is “Cyberspace”? What is “Cyberspace Law”? (Jan. 14) [slides (pdf)][links to slides currently broken; slides avail. upon request]
Course logistics. Professor introduction and background. What is “cyberspace”? Is cyberspace law the “law of the horse”? Generalizations about cyberspace regulation to date. A roadmap for the course. A brief overview of the many cyberspace law topics we won’t be discussing in depth.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:Lawrence Lessig, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Preface, Part I and Part IV (pages 1-43, 213-239) ACLU v. Reno, Part II “Findings of Fact” only <http://www.aclu.org/court/cdadec.html> (These Findings of Fact were adopted wholesale by the U.S. Supreme Court in <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=96-511>; the numbering scheme in the district court decision will be useful for us, however. We’ll revisit the substantive issues in this case later class; for now, just focus on the description of the Internet.)
- John Perry Barlow “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace” (1994?) <http://www.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html> (the now-classic formulation by the ex-Grateful Dead lyricist – short, fun, readable)
- David Johnson and David Post, “Law And Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace” 48 Stanford Law Review 1367 (1996) <http://www.cli.org/X0025_LBFIN.html>
- Joseph Sommer, “Against Cyberlaw,” 15 Berkeley Tech. Law Journal 1145 (2001) <http://www.law.berkeley.edu/journals/btlj/articles/15_3/sommer/sommer.html>
II. Governing the ‘Net: How Can/Should Cyberspace be Regulated? (Jan. 28 [slides (pdf)], Feb. 4 [slides (pdf)])
How can and should the Internet be regulated? What law applies to Internet activities? Which authorities can exercise power over Internet actors? Are new authorities or institutions needed? Key legal focus areas: state jurisdiction, international jurisdiction, dormant commerce clause. Can the Hague Treaty solve the international jurisdiction problem? ICANN as an example of a new regulating authority.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:
- Millennium Enterprises v. Millennium Music (Jan. 1999) <http://www.perkinscoie.com/resource/ecomm/netcase/milleniu.htm>
- Yahoo v. LICRA – California Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment <http://www.cdt.org/jurisdiction/011107judgement.pdf>
- Ferguson v. Friendfinders, Inc. (Jan. 2002) <http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A092653.PDF> (focus on commerce clause issues; we'll revisit the spam issue in a later class)
- Michael Froomkin, “Wrong Turn In Cyberspace: Using ICANN To Route Around The APA And The Constitution,” 50 Duke L. J. 17 (2000) <http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/articles/dlj50p17.htm> (skim enough to understand the basic arguments made in Part IV)
- James Love, “Hague Diplomatic Conference Ends, Badly for Now” (2001) <http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/badly.html>
- Yochai Benkler, Net Regulation: Taking Stock and Looking Forward <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=223248%20> (interesting assessment of attempts to regulate the Net)
- Part III of Michael Geist, Is There a There There? Toward Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction, 16 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1 (Fall 2001), <http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~geist/geistjurisdiction-us.pdf> (part III, which begins on page 16, provides a great overview of state jurisdiction issues)
- Jack L. Goldsmith & Alan O. Sykes, The Internet and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 110 Yale L.J. 785 (2001) <http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=246100>
III. The Copyright/Content Wars (Feb 11 [slides (pdf)], 18 [slides(pdf)], 25 [slides(pdf)])
High stakes culture war? The challenge to copyright law posed by the Internet. Legislative and judicial responses. Copyright basics, derivative liability, “anti-circumvention.” Digital rights management. The open source movement.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:
- Lessig, Code, Chapter 10 “Intellectual Property” (pages 122-141), Chapter 8 “The Limits in Open Code” (pages 100-108)
- Mike Godwin, “Copywrong” <http://reason.com/0107/cr.mg.copywrong.shtml> (review of Jessica Litman’s excellent book, Digital Copyright)
- A&M Records v. Napster (9th Cir., Feb. 12, 2001) <http://www.nyls.edu/samuels/copyright/beyond/cases/napster.html>
- News.com article “Suit hits popular post-Napster network” <http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7389552.html>
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v ReplayTV & SonicBlue Complaint (Oct. 30, 2001) <http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/Paramount_v_ReplayTV/20011031_complaint.html>
- US Second Circuit Court of Appeals Decision affirming District Court ruling against defendants, in Universal v. Reimerdes (Nov. 28, 2001) <http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/academics/courses/is235/f01/reimerdes_nov28_2001.pdf>
- EFF’s US v. Sklyarov FAQ <http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/US_v_Sklyarov/us_v_sklyarov_faq.html>
- Slashdot’s Felton v. RIAA coverage <http://slashdot.org/features/01/11/30/1739226.shtml> (amateur Net journalism at it’s very best)
- The GNU Public License (GPL) <http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.html>
- John Perry Barlow, The Economy of Ideas, 2.03 WIRED 84 (1994) <http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html>
- Pamela Samuelson, Copyright Grab, 4.01 WIRED 135 (1996) <http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.01/white.paper.html>
- Kid Rock Starves to Death: MP3 Piracy Blamed <http://www.theonion.com/onion3618/kid_rock_starves.html>
- NY Times index of stories about music on the Internet <http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/reference/index-music.html>
- Dan L. Burk & Julie E. Cohen, Fair Use Infrastructure for Copyright Management Systems, 11 Harv. J. Law & Tech. (2001?) <http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=239731>
- Gallery of CSS Descramblers <http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/>
- David McGowan, Legal Implications of Open Source Software, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 241 (2001) <http://www.law.umn.edu/FacultyProfiles/articles/OpenSourceFinal.pdf>
- EFF/Wilson Sonsini Memo in support of Streamcast (Morpheus) Summary Judgment <http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/20020122_streamcast_memo_sum_judg.pdf>
- Edited and annotated version of Napster <http://bradbiddle.com/asu/napster.pdf>
IV. Civil and criminal "trespass" in cyberspace; plus, the Spam Menace (March 4 [slides(pdf)])
Can the ancient legal doctrine of "trespass to chattels" be used to “wall off” cyberspace? To protect otherwise unprotectable factual data? Can the CFAA serve these purposes? Plus more on regulating spam.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:
- Intel v. Hamidi, CA Court of Appeals (Dec. 11, 2001) <http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C033076.PDF> (including dissent)
- E.F. Cultural Travel v. Explorica, 1st Circuit Ct. of Appeals (Dec. 17, 2001) <http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=01-2000.01A>
- Skim <http://www.spamlaws.com/state/summary.html>
- David Post, Of Blackholes and Decentralized Lawmaking in Cyberspace, 2 Vand. J. Ent. L. & Prac. 70 (2000) <http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/blackhole.html>
V. eContracting, eSignatures, PKI and UCITA (March 18 [CLASS CANCELLED], March 25 [slides(pdf)])
Forming contracts online. Shrinkwrap, bootscreen, clickthrough and browsewrap agreements. E-SIGN, UETA and UCITA. The PKI debate and its legacy. Hard international issues.
Required Reading:
- Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp., 2001 WL 755396 (SDNY, July 5, 2001) <http://pub.bna.com/lw/00cv4871.pdf>
- Brad Biddle, “Short History of Digital and Electronic Signature Legislation,” in Simson Garfinkel, Web Security, Privacy and Commerce (2nd Edition, O’Reilly, 2001) <http://bradbiddle.com/history.html>
- Jane Winn & Robert Wittie, “E-Sign of the Times,” E-Commerce Law Report (August 2000) <http://faculty.smu.edu/jwinn/esignofthetimes.html>
- Review the information and links at <http://www.infoworld.com/ucita/> in enough depth to understand the basic goals of UCITA and why it is controversial
Optional Reading:
- TBD
VI. Privacy and anonymity (April 1 [slides(pdf)])
The privacy debate. Privacy policies. Privacy torts, COPPA, GLB, the ECPA and other legislation. The E.U. Directive.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:
- Lessig, Code Chapter 11 “Privacy” (pages 142-163)
- Proposed DoubleClick settlement (Mar. 29, 2002) <http://settlement.doubleclick.net/settlement/>
VII. Regulating speech on the ‘Net (April 8 [slides(pdf)])
The First Amendment in cyberspace.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:
- Lessig, Code, Chapter 12 “Free Speech” (pages 165-185)
- ACLU v. Reno, 117 S.Ct. 2329 (1997) <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=96-511>
- Plus review the Yahoo and Corley/Reimerdes cases discussed earlier
- TBD
VIII. Non-IP-related derivative liability and the CDA (April 15 [slides(pdf)])
The profound effects of a 26-word remnant of the CDA.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:
- Zeran v. America Online, Inc.) 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997) <http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/zeran/71112opn.htm>
- TBD
IX. A hurried overview of domain name law, and course summary (April 22 [slides(pdf)])
WIPO, ICANN, the UDRP and the ACPA. Review of what we’ve covered, and a reiteration of the fact that there is much we have not covered.
Required Reading:Optional Reading:
- ICANN, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy <http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm>
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney (4th Cir.) <http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/001918.P.pdf>
- Michael Geist, “Fair.com?: An Examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP” <http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~geist/geistudrp.pdf>